September 16, 1920 | The Wall Street Bombing and the Mystery That Endured

Explore the full date: Today in History – September 16.

At 12:01 p.m. on September 16, 1920, the financial district’s lunchtime movement was broken by an explosion at Wall and Broad Streets. A horse-drawn wagon had stopped near the United States Assay Office, opposite J. P. Morgan & Co. The driver was gone. Hidden in the load were explosives and heavy metal sash weights intended to become shrapnel.

The blast killed people in the street and inside nearby buildings, shattered windows and scarred stone façades. Thirty-eight people ultimately died and hundreds were injured. The bombers were never conclusively identified.

An ordinary wagon in the financial district

Wall Street in 1920 was both a working street and a symbol. Clerks, messengers, stenographers, brokers and laborers moved among banks, government offices and exchanges. The Morgan building at 23 Wall Street represented concentrated private finance. Across the street, the federal Assay Office handled precious metals. The New York Stock Exchange stood nearby.

According to the later reconstruction, the wagon carried dynamite or a similar explosive surrounded by cast-iron sash weights. A timer or fuse detonated the charge just after noon, when the sidewalks were crowded. The horse and wagon were destroyed. Fragments struck people and buildings across the intersection.

Many victims were not financiers. They were young office workers, messengers and people passing through the district. Contemporary casualty totals varied as the wounded died; the accepted death toll became 38. The physical marks on the Morgan façade remained visible long afterward.

Rescue, confusion and a damaged crime scene

Police, firefighters, medical workers and bystanders moved into the wreckage. Vehicles carried the wounded to hospitals. Trading stopped briefly, but officials and business leaders were determined to demonstrate that the district still functioned. By the next morning, Wall Street had reopened.

That speed became part of the story of resilience, but it also had an investigative cost. Workers cleared debris and washed the street before modern forensic preservation could occur. Fragments, wagon parts and traces of explosive that might now be handled as evidence were dispersed in the urgent restoration.

Investigators initially considered an accident. A boiler explosion or collision involving explosives seemed possible. The deliberate construction of the bomb and the discovery of warning leaflets shifted the inquiry toward political violence.

The leaflets and the Red Scare

A postal worker found crudely printed leaflets in a mailbox near the scene. They demanded freedom for political prisoners and were signed “American Anarchist Fighters.” Their wording resembled messages associated with the bomb campaigns of 1919, when packages and planted explosives targeted public officials, judges and businessmen.

The United States was in the aftermath of World War I and the First Red Scare. The Bolshevik Revolution, strikes, racial violence and anarchist bombings had fed public fear. Attorney General A. Mitchell Palmer’s Justice Department conducted raids and deportations that violated civil liberties. Italian anarchists associated with Luigi Galleani were prime suspects in several attacks.

The Bureau of Investigation, predecessor of the FBI, worked alongside New York police, the Secret Service and other agencies. Investigators interviewed witnesses, traced wagon and horseshoe evidence, studied printed leaflets and examined explosive components. Descriptions of the driver were vague. Common materials produced too many possible leads.

A case without a proven perpetrator

Authorities suspected Galleanist anarchists, and later historians have often judged that theory the most plausible. One name repeatedly discussed was Mario Buda, an associate of convicted anarchists Sacco and Vanzetti. Yet no prosecution established his responsibility, and no surviving evidence closes the case.

That distinction matters. The bombing can be described as an intentional terrorist attack; the political context and leaflets support an anarchist motive. It cannot responsibly be presented as a solved crime. The FBI’s own history says its early suspicion remains the best explanation while acknowledging that the mystery endures.

Rumor moved faster than evidence. Some blamed Bolsheviks, labor radicals or foreign agents. The attack became usable in arguments for surveillance and repression. It also showed how an unsolved crime could amplify fear far beyond the physical blast zone.

The attack’s institutional legacy

The Wall Street bombing was not the first act of political violence in the United States, nor the first bombing in New York. It became one of the young Bureau of Investigation’s most important early terrorism cases. The limitations of the inquiry—fragmented jurisdiction, poor evidence preservation and weak forensic tools—were lessons later agencies claimed in building more systematic investigative practices.

Security around financial and government sites tightened. Public discussion linked the bombing to debates over immigration, radical politics and state power. The victims, however, can disappear when the event is told only as a security milestone. Most were people at work or in transit, caught in a deliberately chosen public place.

Why the unsolved ending matters

The temptation to give historical violence a neat culprit is strong. In this case, the honest ending remains uncertainty. The scene, weapon, casualties, leaflets and investigation are documented. Attribution is inference.

The Wall Street intersection returned to business almost immediately, and the city grew around it. The pockmarks on 23 Wall Street survived as a material record. They testify both to the attack and to what the investigation could not recover after the street was cleared.

Continue exploring

• Explore another September 16 story: the Montreal Protocol and the ozone treaty that worked.
• Browse Major Historical Events.
• Read the evidence-led account of the September 11 attacks.
• Explore the hijacking of Pan Am Flight 73.
• Follow the unresolved legacies of Iran’s 1953 coup.

The bomb in the financial district

The location made the attack instantly symbolic. The wagon stood near the U.S. Assay Office and opposite the J. P. Morgan building in the heart of Wall Street. At noon, when clerks, messengers and office workers filled the streets, the explosives detonated and metal weights packed with the bomb became shrapnel.

More than thirty people were killed immediately and the eventual death toll rose to thirty-eight. Hundreds were injured. Buildings were damaged, windows shattered and the street was littered with debris. Yet the financial district reopened quickly, a decision intended both to restore business and to deny the attackers the appearance of having paralyzed the city.

An investigation before modern forensic practice

The bombing became a difficult test for American investigators. Police, the Secret Service and the Bureau of Investigation—the predecessor of the FBI—pursued leads, interviewed witnesses and tried to reconstruct the wagon and explosive device. But the crime scene had been cleaned rapidly, destroying evidence that would be considered crucial in a modern investigation.

Witness descriptions of the driver were vague. The bomb used components that were widely available. Investigators also had to work without the centralized forensic databases and standardized evidence-handling procedures that later became routine.

The anarchist hypothesis

Investigators found printed leaflets nearby that demanded the release of political prisoners and used the name “American Anarchist Fighters.” The language resembled propaganda associated with earlier bombing campaigns. Suspicion therefore focused on followers of the Italian anarchist Luigi Galleani, whose network had been linked to bomb attacks in 1919.

The evidence never produced a prosecutable identification of the Wall Street bomber. The FBI’s own historical account says later analysis still points toward a small group of Italian anarchists, but the case remains officially unsolved. That distinction matters: a strong historical hypothesis is not the same thing as proof.

Wall Street after the blast

The bombing took place during the first Red Scare, when fears of revolution, labor unrest and anarchist violence shaped American politics. Those fears affected how authorities and newspapers interpreted the attack. They also contributed to a wider climate in which immigration, radical politics and civil liberties were fiercely contested.

The physical traces lasted longer than the disruption to business. Marks from the explosion remained visible on buildings around the site. In that sense the financial district resumed its routine while carrying evidence of the attack in its architecture.

Why the mystery endured

The case survives because it combines a highly public act of violence with the absence of a definitive culprit. The Bureau pursued the investigation for years, but leads faded and no one was convicted. That unresolved ending prevents the story from becoming a neat detective narrative.

September 16, 1920 therefore marks both an early major terrorism investigation in the United States and a lesson in the limits of historical certainty. Investigators could establish what happened, where the bomb had been placed and the political milieu from which it likely came. They could not prove who drove the wagon.

Institutional source: the FBI’s historical case file summarizes the investigation, surviving evidence and the continuing uncertainty over responsibility.