London, September 13, 1940. King George VI and Queen Elizabeth were inside Buckingham Palace when the sound of an approaching bomb cut across the morning. Their later written accounts do not need embellishment. The king recorded six bombs falling across the palace grounds: two in the forecourt, two in the quadrangle, one at the private chapel and one in the garden. The building that represented the monarchy at war had itself become part of the Blitz.
Explore the complete September 13 Daily Edition →
A palace inside the target area
By mid-September, London had already endured a week of sustained German attacks. The Luftwaffe’s mass raid of September 7 is generally treated as the beginning of the Blitz. Docks, factories, rail links and neighborhoods were hit, and the bombing soon reached far beyond strictly military objectives. Buckingham Palace stood near government buildings, railway approaches and the dense center of the capital. Its prominence made every strike politically charged, but it did not place the palace outside the geography of danger.
The royal family had decided to remain in Britain. The king and queen spent nights at Windsor Castle and worked in London, visiting damaged districts, hospitals, troops and civil-defense organizations. Their daughters, Princesses Elizabeth and Margaret, stayed at Windsor for much of the war. The decision was practical as well as symbolic: the sovereign’s public role required visibility, yet the palace offered no immunity from a modern air campaign.
September 13 was not the first time a bomb had fallen near the palace, nor would it be the last. It became the best remembered because the king and queen were present and because the official record preserves the sequence of impacts in unusual detail.
Six bombs across the grounds
The Royal Archives account, drawing on the king’s diary and the queen’s letter to her mother-in-law, places the couple in a sitting room when the raid reached the palace. They heard the descent of a bomb and moved away from the windows. An explosion followed in the quadrangle. Smoke and displaced earth rose outside; glass and masonry were damaged. The private chapel was struck badly enough that it could no longer serve its intended purpose.
The pattern mattered. This was not a single distant blast later absorbed into legend. Six bombs were recorded across the forecourt, quadrangle, chapel and garden. The palace remained standing and the royal couple were not hurt, but the damage was real and visible. Photographs made afterward showed debris and broken fabric within a royal residence that many people knew only through ceremony.
The queen’s contemporary letter is especially valuable because it fixes what she actually observed. It supports a restrained reconstruction: a palace marked by localized destruction, not the firestorm or total collapse sometimes suggested by later retellings. The documentation also prevents a cinematic error common in popular history—the temptation to invent shouted orders, heroic poses or a dramatic escape. The historical force of the morning lies in the plain fact that the monarch and queen were present while bombs crossed the building’s grounds.
Damage, inspection and public meaning
After the raid, the king and queen inspected the damage. Their presence quickly became part of wartime communication. Queen Elizabeth’s often-repeated remark that she could now “look the East End in the face” expressed solidarity with Londoners who had lost homes and family members on a scale far beyond the palace damage. The sentence endured because it recognized that shared exposure was not the same as shared loss.
The palace bombing could easily have been presented as a story only about royalty. In context, it belongs to the broader civilian history of the Blitz. Imperial War Museums records that roughly 43,500 civilians were killed during the nine months of sustained bombing that followed September 7. Thousands more were injured, displaced or made homeless. The damaged chapel became news because it was Buckingham Palace; ruined houses in East London, Coventry, Liverpool, Plymouth and other cities carried the heavier human burden.
Still, symbols affect morale. German propaganda could claim that the British state was vulnerable. British reporting could answer that the royal family remained at its post. Both readings recognized the same new reality: aerial war could breach the old boundaries between front line, capital and home.
The chapel and the memory of the Blitz
The private chapel was not simply patched and returned to use. After the war, the damaged space was transformed into the Queen’s Gallery, opened in 1962 to display works from the Royal Collection. The adaptation gave physical form to a larger pattern in postwar Britain: sites of destruction were repaired, repurposed and folded into public memory.
Buckingham Palace was bombed multiple times during the war. The September 13 strike nevertheless became the defining episode because its records bring together institution and eyewitness evidence. The king’s diary supplies a concise tally. The queen’s letter preserves proximity and sequence. Official photographs document the aftermath. Together they make it possible to narrate the event closely without fictionalizing it.
Why September 13 still matters
The bombing did not alter the military course of the Battle of Britain, and it was minor beside the destruction inflicted on ordinary communities. Its historical importance lies elsewhere. The attack condensed the logic of total war into a single location: even the residence of the head of state was within reach, while the monarchy’s response became part of the national effort to sustain morale.
Remembering the episode responsibly means holding two truths together. The bomb damage to the palace was authentic and politically significant. The suffering of civilians across Britain was incomparably greater. The best history does not need to choose between them; it uses the palace record as an entry point into the wider human geography of the Blitz.
Continue exploring: visit the World War II archive, read how the London Blitz began on September 7, revisit Britain and France declaring war in 1939.
Sources and method
This account is based principally on the Royal Household’s archival summary, “The 80th anniversary of the bombing of Buckingham Palace during the Blitz”, which cites King George VI’s diary and Queen Elizabeth’s contemporary correspondence. Wider context comes from Imperial War Museums’ histories of the royal family during the Second World War and the Blitz around Britain. Where later retellings conflict with contemporary records, the archival evidence is preferred.
Written and fact-checked by the Discover Today in History editorial team. The featured artwork is an AI-assisted historical reconstruction based on the documented damage pattern; it is not an authentic 1940 photograph.
